So I wrote a long diatribe last year about the BCS (Bowl
Championship Series), and how it had become a completely bastardized version of
what it was originally intended to be. It had become (even more than when it
was created) a money-making venture and little more. However, once the BCS contract
is up in 2013, we’ll finally have what we’ve been waiting for in college
football, a college football playoffs. I’m sure everyone is really weeping over
the death of the BCS, and lamenting the loss of the biased computer system that
seems to always favor teams from the South, specifically the Southeast (the
S-E-C, Southeastern Conference). Good riddance…
While I certainly don’t like the BCS, in general, due to
their unseemly practices of putting profit over sport, I am particular upset
with the organization this year, in that they’re screwing over my favorite team
in college football, Notre Dame. Okay, I get it, people don’t like Notre Dame.
Notre Dame has been given preferential treatment by the NCAA and TV stations
for years, so it’s time for them to get screwed, right? Well, no. The BCS is
not supposed to bias against teams because they’re not popularly loved. Or, I
guess more truly, they’re either loved or loathed. Just a little background, I
did not attend ND, but I’ve loved the school since I was a little kid; and
since my college never had a good football team (and doesn’t even have one
anymore), I’ve continued to root for them. I guess it’s my Irish ancestry…
Anyway, I digress.
Notre Dame has been screwed in the first BCS rankings that
have been released for the 2012 season. Notre Dame is 6-0 and ranked number 5;
they have faced three ranked opponents, Michigan, Michigan State, and Stanford.
Kansas State, who is ranked ahead of ND at number 4, has faced one ranked
opponent (Oklahoma at #6), and just happens to be in another conference that he
BCS favors, the Big 12. Oregon is also ranked above ND at number 3, but that is
at least understandable, because Oregon has one of the most (if not THE most) high-powered
offenses in the country, and has been dominant over the last few years. But
then we come to Florida at number 2. Florida beat LSU, who at the time was the #2
team in the nation, and they’ve beat another ranked time (Tennessee at #24),
but I don’t see how that puts them ahead of Notre Dame. Oh, right, they’re in
the SEC. What a coincidence, so it the #1 team, the #6 team, and the #7 team
(Alabama, LSU, and South Carolina, respectively).
I’ll give the SEC their props, they’re a great conference,
but that doesn’t automatically mean that they’re better teams and therefore should
get pushed up in ranking, just because they supposedly have a tougher strength
of schedule. Notre Dame is not in a conference, but has consistently played
tough teams and beat them, therefore they should be ranked based upon their
performance and strength of schedule, not their conference (or lack thereof). Notre
Dame should be ranked #3.
p.s. I’m willing to bet
that when South Carolina beats Florida this weekend at the Swamp, you’ll see SC
leapfrog Notre Dame and jump down to #3, while Notre Dame will probably only drop
down to #4. Ugh…such is life.
2 comments:
This is another language to me so I'll just say... Go Cocks (USC - my hometown fav!) and Fight On! (The other USC). :D
Also, shoutout to my undergrad Howard U. Our football team is in the unnoticed MEAC conference but we won homecoming this weekend! Woo hoo!
I wanted South Carolina to beat Florida, but alas...
But the Trojans destroyed Colorado, so you did get a win there.
ND won over the weekend also, although it was a pretty lackluster victory over an unranked team, I don't think the ranking will change at all.
Post a Comment