I’ve got to give it to Newt Gingrich, the guy is savvy. He decries
career politicians, while he has been the ultimate career politician. Even as a
“businessman” and “consultant” he was still playing a political role by
influencing policy through lobbying. His actual political career was only ended
once he was thrown out of the Speakership by angry Republicans. He derides Mitt
Romney for not being conservative enough, while himself has a spotty record of
jumpy from side to side, depending up on the policy. To note: I don’t think
this is a bad thing, but for hardcore conservatives, it is. He scorns Mitt
Romney for his super PACs being funded and run by friends and former staffers,
but the nature of super PACs being what they are anyone with super PACs in
support of them can’t really talk. Romney’s super PACs are attacking Newt
Gingrich (which Newt says is the reason for his big loss in Iowa), but Newt’s
super PACs are attacking Romney right back. Thieves can’t point fingers at
others calling them thieves; they’re all scumbags, and none of them deserve to
be president. I will say this about Barack Obama, as well, if he decides to use
super PACs during his re-election campaign. If we are to restore democracy, we
need to get all money, but especially money coming from unnamed sources, to be
completely removed. We should completely change the electoral process, both
locally and nationally, embrace moderation over ideology and allow no campaign
ads, but simply have publically-funded elections that use debates as the only
campaign tools.
No comments:
Post a Comment